Originally shot through a magnifying glass, old school macro.
Brought in from RAW what is essentially the blurry picture you see here.
Added a curves layer over the reds to lighten the flower. Hue/Sat to mute and de-bloody the reds.
Dodging and burning some highlights and shadows.
Added warmth.
I expect 5.2 or so, possibly less in this challenge with some of the Canon Electron MicroscopeL lenses we'll see.
[Jul. 16th, 2011 07:45:13 PM]
Not sure I agree about the crop comments, but that's my preference. I liked the "en plein air" or "out in the open" aspect of this perspective. It is not so much a shot of an ant's nostril as it is an ant and his environment.
Statistics
Place: 173 out of 197 Avg (all users): 4.7160 Avg (commenters): 7.0000 Avg (participants): 4.6071 Avg (non-participants): 4.8235 Views since voting: 618 Views during voting: 289 Votes: 169 Comments: 9 Favorites: 1 (view)
4.7? I can understand your disappointment with this score. Sometimes I think it's important to know when to disregard the score though. For a stock-look or landscape style shot my belief is the score is a fairly decent assessment of an image (usually). When it comes to "photography as art" though, which seems to be a hot subject in the forum right now, the score really means nothing and I think individual assessments of an image are all that's important.
Man, was this one underrated! But then I notice as I'm going through that I valued environment and slice-of-life shots more than most of the voters. Still really love this :-)