Author Thread
04/06/2011 12:10:55 PMPost actions
Originally posted by EL-ROI:
Look at that, you used f11... wonder how you got such a short focal length at 60mm.
Guessing the subject distance and inputing your stats in DOF calculator you get the following results:
Subject distance 3 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 2.85 ft
Far limit 3.16 ft
Total 0.31 ft
In front of subject 0.15 ft (47%)
Behind subject 0.16 ft (53%)
............................................
Subject distance 5 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 4.6 ft
Far limit 5.48 ft
Total 0.88 ft
In front of subject 0.4 ft (46%)
Behind subject 0.48 ft (54%)
.............................................
Subject distance 6 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 5.43 ft
Far limit 6.71 ft
Total 1.28 ft
In front of subject 0.57 ft (45%)
Behind subject 0.71 ft (55%)
.............................................
Subject distance 8 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 7.01 ft
Far limit 9.32 ft
Total 2.32 ft
In front of subject 0.99 ft (43%)
Behind subject 1.32 ft (57%)
sorry for cluttering up your comments... just going to school on your image!!
(The distance was < 12 cm) It's a miniature cactus
Thanks
Tareq
04/06/2011 09:58:32 AMPost actions
Look at that, you used f11... wonder how you got such a short focal length at 60mm.
Guessing the subject distance and inputing your stats in DOF calculator you get the following results:
Subject distance 3 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 2.85 ft
Far limit 3.16 ft
Total 0.31 ft
In front of subject 0.15 ft (47%)
Behind subject 0.16 ft (53%)
............................................
Subject distance 5 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 4.6 ft
Far limit 5.48 ft
Total 0.88 ft
In front of subject 0.4 ft (46%)
Behind subject 0.48 ft (54%)
.............................................
Subject distance 6 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 5.43 ft
Far limit 6.71 ft
Total 1.28 ft
In front of subject 0.57 ft (45%)
Behind subject 0.71 ft (55%)
.............................................
Subject distance 8 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 7.01 ft
Far limit 9.32 ft
Total 2.32 ft
In front of subject 0.99 ft (43%)
Behind subject 1.32 ft (57%)
sorry for cluttering up your comments... just going to school on your image!!
Photographer found comment helpful.
Comments Made During the Challenge
04/05/2011 06:10:45 AMPost actions
Simply beautiful. Works great and this has my vote 8
Photographer found comment helpful.
04/04/2011 07:52:24 PMPost actions
the lighting is stunning and the composition very good - i just wish you would have tried to get this in a 8x10 to really give it a Weston feel
Photographer found comment helpful.
04/04/2011 07:51:01 PMPost actions
Photographer found comment helpful.
04/02/2011 11:54:52 AMPost actions
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/31/2011 11:20:33 AMPost actions
very nice. Excellent original work.
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/31/2011 01:13:46 AMPost actions
Lovely. The cactus looks great in b/w, and the soft shape of the blooms is a great contrast to the spines of the cactus.
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/30/2011 11:31:36 AMPost actions
This is gorgeous. The control of the light is perfect, highlighting the bright flowers just enough to prevent the image from being swallowed by all the black.
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/30/2011 09:19:37 AMPost actions
There's something about this that I like. The low key lighting is great.
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/30/2011 08:46:31 AMPost actions
Awesome lighting, great form. I think this is something Weston would have photographed had he encountered it! Great blacks and shadow, you did well with limiting the highlights. One thing I see that was not indicative of a Weston photo is the use of DoF. You used a shallower DoF than what I have seen in the Weston works that I have viewed. I think he would have shot this at f8, f11, f22, somewhere around there. I do really like this!
Photographer found comment helpful.
03/30/2011 01:09:31 AMPost actions
like the idea, the lighting works as well
Photographer found comment helpful.