To those that got it, thank you.
About this picture: First, I did not want to introduce a sexy looking picture, because it takes away from the the message. I then selected a foreshortening angle combined with closed legs at the bottom to change the look of the mass. I then created a layer, GB and worked the edges to remove firmness. I even changed the shadow values very slightly to give the rear a softer look. Out of this layer I erased the juncture of the buttocks. I then played with the channels to augment skin imperfections. I even burned the hands around the joints and knuckles. yes, I got carried away. Well, at the end it was a nude butt, but not overpowering as a sexual image. Shoot me.
I am afraid to look around front and see frank and beans- this is erotic in a tabboo sort of way. very well done though. I can't wait to read all about this picture.
Very masculine legs, not that that's a negative... Quite a quirky and riske interpretation of freedom but I like it. It's simple, limited colours, high impact! 7
This is just unnattractive and gross. While she is in good shape, her legs and buttucks just aren't lovely enough to get away with this. Her hand looks rather rough. I just want her to put her skirt back down and put some panties on.
You must have had some fun doing this shot. I love it - well composed and lit and yet simple and effective. Definately free, Marilyn eat your heart out (10)