This one really strikes me - very nice. My only teeny grip is the loss of focus at the top edge - but it's really difficult to be critical of a nice abstract like this.
I love the title. I don't know if you coined the word yourself: it is not entirely absent from the Internet but is awfully obscure even so.
I like it applied to Minimalism. I think that's a wonderful goal for this movement: to create some sort of basic unit of imagery. This title/concept brings out the strength of your image: its boldness. You've risked being too simple, and not original enough, in order to achieve this boldness. I think it works.
I coined and then searched to see if it existed. This was what convinced me to go ahead and use it. I was afraid it might be either too pretentious or just a detriment for lack of Webster's documentation. Thank you for taking interest enough to look into it.
I love the title. I don't know if you coined the word yourself: it is not entirely absent from the Internet but is awfully obscure even so.
I like it applied to Minimalism. I think that's a wonderful goal for this movement: to create some sort of basic unit of imagery. This title/concept brings out the strength of your image: its boldness. You've risked being too simple, and not original enough, in order to achieve this boldness. I think it works.
Is this a bit too dead center, I mean, you must ask yourself that. I love the contrast shape, serenity and zen of the form, but it seems to lack that final je ne sais quoi. (Still its superb amongst a field of technically proficient but absent of theme shots.)
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
