Author Thread
Post actions
Amazing. Amazing. Amazing. I can't believe this didn't ribbon.
Post actions
Very well executed and awesome composition. Congratulations on your top ten placement.
Post actions
Excelent execution and control of the light especially considering the table was exposed 4 times (unless you covered it?)
Post actions
Great result man, and a big 'Booooooo' to all the people claiming it's more than two exposures. For all they know, you could have an identical twin! Way to go.
Comments Made During the Challenge
Post actions
Amazing shot!. Very well executed. My only nit pick would be a little more light on the pants. Great job!
Post actions
Interesting and clever shot! A little dark in exposure (as well as tone). However, -2 for doing four exposures instead of a double exposure. Bummer because I'm sure this took a LOT of work to do!!! 7-2 = 5
Post actions
One of my favorites of the challenge so far... Great work 10
Post actions
I like this. Great idea and great execution (no pun intended).
Post actions
4 heads are better than one! Nice job. 8
Post actions
Post actions
Post actions
kind of Dexter like -- neat
Post actions
The effect is just awesome. A bit out of focus, but given the conditions, really well done. Eerie.
Post actions
less contrast would help. nice idea!
Post actions
I would like to see a bit more negative space on top but given the average quality of the challenge I cannot do this picture justice with anything below 9*.
Post actions
Holy shit! 10 10 10 10 I wish I could vote for 20!
Post actions
not voting right now but there is a good chance that you exposed more than twice ??
Post actions
I like this, but is this a double exposure
Post actions
Very nice work... but there are more than two exposures... 5
Post actions
Post actions
Nice idea and execution. But this seems like 4 exposures and not a double "2" exposure(s).
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
