I like the composition of your shot. I feel a little conflicted because I really like the shadows you've captured with this light/time of day, but that same light seems over exposed/burnt out in the center. Perhaps you could have waited a little or taken just a little sooner, depending on if it is morning or evening. A difference of maybe 15-30 min. if that, could catch the sun lower behind trees, cutting down on the brightness, yet still catching interesting shadows.
I just want to thank you for your comment. This really helps when someone gives me a tip and not just a critique. Thanks so much. I will try that.
That shot would certainly ruffle feathers in the press - it's a lovely wood to lose. If this is true then it's very sad. OK it's not a car park at least, but it does still do a lot of damage to the local species.
Photographically, it's flawed (blown sky) but the shadows are great.
This is a nice photo, I like the long shadows. I have one problem about the title. It is editorialized. Why you may think it is a beautiful park, the reader may not. With headlines try to stick to the facts. Say this photo is for a story about local citizens upset that this park is going to become a golf course. How about "Proposed Course Location Angers Locals" The story and caption could tell the reader where the location is.
I like the composition of your shot. I feel a little conflicted because I really like the shadows you've captured with this light/time of day, but that same light seems over exposed/burnt out in the center. Perhaps you could have waited a little or taken just a little sooner, depending on if it is morning or evening. A difference of maybe 15-30 min. if that, could catch the sun lower behind trees, cutting down on the brightness, yet still catching interesting shadows.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
