Exposure: 0.003 sec (1/400)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 6.2 mm
ISO Speed: 80
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: Off, Did not fire
File Size: 593 kB
File Type: JPEG
MIME Type: image/jpeg
Image Width: 3488
Image Height: 2616
Encoding Process: Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample: 8
Color Components: 3
X-Resolution: 96 dpi
Y-Resolution: 96 dpi
Orientation: Unknown (0)
Software: Picasa 3.0
Date and Time (Modified): 2009:11:02 16:36:00
YCbCr Positioning: Co-sited
Padding: (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Exposure Program: Program AE
Date and Time (Original): 2009:11:02 16:36:00
Date and Time (Digitized): 2009:11:02 16:36:00
Compressed Bits Per Pixel: 2
Brightness Value: 7.81
Max Aperture Value: 2.8
Metering Mode: Multi-segment
Light Source: Unknown
Color Space: Uncalibrated
Focal Plane X-Resolution: 4482
Focal Plane Y-Resolution: 4482
Sensing Method: One-chip color area
Custom Rendered: Normal
Exposure Mode: Auto
White Balance: Auto
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Contrast: Normal
Saturation: Normal
Sharpness: Normal
Image Unique ID: d1389edba6ece5bf88f3a022886351ab
Subject Distance Range: Unknown
Padding: (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Offset Schema: 4112
Compression: JPEG (old-style)
Statistics
Place: 362 out of 366 Avg (all users): 3.7379 Avg (commenters): 3.3750 Avg (participants): 3.7714 Avg (non-participants): 3.6500 Views since voting: 1210 Views during voting: 49 Votes: 145 Comments: 8 Favorites: 0
OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: Well, I'll try to offer something here - I do like the colour of the sky and the skeletal silhouettes of the trees are well demonstrated.
Critical stuff: I'm sorry but I think there just isn't enough going on here to hold a viewers interest; I was going to say that the image is too small (and it is) but in this case I don't think it really matters, because I don't think there is too much we are missing at any size.
Overall: I'm genuinely puzzled, you must've seen something in this image to offer it up; I only wish I could see it too.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
