Just a little fun. Spent about 10 minutes total for this entry. I actually like the way it turned out, but it will score like poop. Good times!
Lori says a 4.9.
I say a 4.4.
Winner gets ice cream!
[Jun. 17th, 2009 04:45:41 PM]
Looks like we both overestimated the voters on this one! Running at about a 3.7 at the moment.
I figured it would score poorly as it's pretty abstract and I don't have a sharp subject against a motion blurred background, but I'm surprised that people don't "see" the motion panning. Is it that hard to tell that all of those lines are panned spots?
Thanks Karen and Don! You guys make it all worthwhile.
Statistics
Place: 84 out of 91 Avg (all users): 4.1805 Avg (commenters): 4.0000 Avg (participants): 3.4500 Avg (non-participants): 4.3576 Views since voting: 915 Views during voting: 414 Votes: 205 Comments: 9 Favorites: 1 (view)
sorry. This isn't motion panning. There is motion but motion panning involves tracking a moving subject with the result being a sharp subject and a blurred background.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
