Thanks for the comments and advice. I'm sure most people figured out that this was a multi exposure, with 5 exposures in total. I guess the shot was spoiled a little by the line... ah.. Well, the line was the meeting point of two sheets of paper. I think the multi-exposure made the line more noticeable. Although the line wasn't intentional in the original shot, I thought (as inspzil suggested) that it helped the overall illusion. I thought the line dividing the picture was like a metaphor for the dolls, which also were divided in two, and also helped the transparency illusion. But I guess it was pretty distracting and the shot would have looked better without it.
Pretty good concept and nicely executed. At first glance, I thought the line thru the middle of them was distracting, but now I realize that it's a tool in this shot. Nice job - Inspzil
The line where wall and floor meet spoil the picture. Maybe a better result with a one piece background linnen, where there is no edge, only a flowing invisible curve?
This is a neat shot. The line that runs through the middle of the shot is distracting... and it's making me wonder what it is? :) Very neat idea though... - JB
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
