Not a clue what you guys will make of this. It certainly wasn't the photo I set out to shoot. We went to a certain spot by the embankment where there are often lots of birds. (not telling you what my plan was as I'm going to try and shoot it for a future challenge ;-) ) didn't see a single bird where we were walking, but we walked under a bridge and I looked up and saw this. Dead chuffed with this find, less so with the photo.
We're underneath a dual carriageway which, as you can see from the roof, turns slightly to the left, which ruins the perspective of the pillars somewhat.
Firstly, my triangle I would say is implied as only two of the sides have pronounced lines, the third horizontal line isn't there. You're perfectly entitled to disagree though :-) Also, my main subject isn't the triangle, but the graffiti inside (and I suspect most people missed that as it wasn't very easy to convey in basic) Therefore my triangle frames my subject and for me draws attention to it.
"Foxy" is a word in amongst the graffiti that you can just about read. I predict some "wtf?" comments from people who can't see it. I thought about calling it "foxy graffiti" but decided no - got to make you do some thinking.
Statistics
Place: 65 out of 172 Avg (all users): 5.3757 Avg (commenters): 5.7143 Avg (participants): 5.0536 Avg (non-participants): 5.5200 Views since voting: 777 Views during voting: 246 Votes: 181 Comments: 11 Favorites: 0
I do see the graffiti inside the framed triangles, now that you pointed it out to us.
My only suggestion is that maybe a tighter crop, taking away the top part and making it a square crop format, may have made your message stronger.
Loosing the top area, make the image less busy or distracting, and one then concentrates on the framed triangles, that draws one right into the center of the image, to see the graffiti, like you wanted them to.....
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
