Yes, a classic waterfal/rocks texture picture, but also rather boring IMHO. It looks so static despite the flowing water. I think it is taken too much head on, straight from the front, and the leading lines could be stronger. The flow of water is to the left out of the picture, you really want it to flow out of the front. I would have tried to get a bit closer, just before where those three stones are piled up. And then get closer to the ground. Or even get a bit into the water, still leaving the ground visible on the right of the picture. This might create a more dynamic feeling to it.
Well,when you see a Snapshot of a pet gets more points than a classic waterfall/rocks texture with river leading lines and water at rules of third placed bellow the hill, you get an idea who is voting here !
Sour grapes indeed. It really does need to be cropped closer to the falls if you want a better score. Talk about looking like a snapshot.
Well,when you see a Snapshot of a pet gets more points than a classic waterfall/rocks texture with river leading lines and water at rules of third placed bellow the hill, you get an idea who is voting here !
you deserve top 10.
Forget the people who say a tighter crop... if you do that you wouldn't see the rock... thats what makes this picture apealing to me, contrast and the stark transition from rock to running water to rock...
Wish you had shot this from a little closer to the falls to get less rock and a better look at the effect you acheived with the falls. It would make your subject (the falls) more prominent.
I wanted to do a water motion blur, and did. I didn't know if it would qualify enough for motion blur in people's minds. I really like this shot. You have a great composition, good color, sharp focus. I believe that this is an ok motion blur because it is "long exposure." I like the little rock statue in front of it. I have built and photographed statues like that. Awsome shot!