My sister-in-law during her pregnancy. This series was shot throughout her pregnancy to chronicle the changes her body underwent. Her husband is on his second tour in Iraq now and this series was shot mainly for him.
Post-DQ Well, I knew I was pushing the envelope, but this is OBVIOUSLY a time-lapse image. Unfortunately I was a little unclear on the new ruleset and technically the image does violate them once I re-read them a couple of times. Oh well... what can you do?
Disqualification Details
Moving frames relative to each other is outside the Advance Rules
Statistics
Views since voting: 1196 Views during voting: 356 Comments: 17 Favorites: 2 (view)
you know, it's a real pity but you will be disqualified for this...the image is superb and I will give you the votes, but the rules say you can't use multiple images, unless they are taken in sequence
it really is beautiful and I am sure the mume will be proud
This is so cool, I've seen progressive photos but I've never seen this idea before.
I hope you don't get DQ'd for not having a 'time lapse' photo that shows a "natural, unbroken motion". I know that's hardly possible in this situation so I hope they work with you on it.
It is a fascinating study, however I do not think it will pass validation. I will assume it is done in a way that is legal and give it a nice 7. Good luck with it. :)
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
