you should take this a step further and change the clothing to make the colors pop. the curiosity factor would be accentuated by also having a curious human subject.
I think if you would have had the flyer in different crazy positions rather than the kite, it would be a bit more interesting. Looks kind of like floating pop cans!
GeneralE: this is more complex than the single swing of a golfer.
ursula: yes, but it's still one lovely line of motion.
GeneralE: but it intersects itself, cuts itself in two.
ursula: but by the time it gets to itself, it's not there anymore.
GeneralE: clearly you know nothing about topology.
scalvert: the photograph incriminates itself. Clearly there is someone flying this kite. That person is using muscles, will, thought, etc. to effect the flight pattern of the kite. It's not natural.
ursula: It's the wind. The wind is natural. She's just holding it to create the proper tension to allow the wind to work on it.
scalvert: but that's an unnatural method for portraying natural phenomena.
That is pretty cool. I bet the kite is tough to fly on really windy days! It looks like the horizon is severely crooked. Maybe just an illusion or a sloped beach, but it distracts my eyes from the kite. 6.
The kites should be the main point of interest here, instead my eye is continually drawn to the person, could probably do with thinking a little more about how you have composed the image.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
