This tree (folks!!) has no waist line. Quite unattractive in my opinion. It's bark is still on too, so WHY is it in the "Nude" gallery? Am I to understand the photographer equates the mere suggestion of genitalia with an unclothed human? And worse, are we to understand that the human body, a female wondrous miracle in particular, is somehow "funny"? This is not funny, not at all. No, it's a crying shame -- a travesty even. You ought to feel ashamed. Many find this behaviour to be childish and inconsiderate. Consider yourselves scorned. :P
HAHAHAHAhahaha!
It took me a a second .... But I'm a little slow sometimes. I wouldn't change a thing about this one. The soft green color in the background against the redish bark is a beautiful mix. Clever entry for the challenge and a weird find.
I can't help but wonder how you might score on an inkblot test.
;-)
Lol...Normally I don't like submissions that need the title as an "explanation". This one works for me. Who would have that that a tree could be naughty? Well done :)
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
