aiming for the brown on this one. not sure if i got it bad enough for sub 2.5 which is what i want.
it is actually me touching my nipple. the shot kept coming out too good so i used a timer then focused and ran towards the camera. BTW the title was misspelled on purpose to get more negative votes.
I hope you hate it:)
I am sorry that so many commentors wasted their time during voting. see this thread
I wanted to explain the 3 rating I am giving this photo. It has several problems: it is too small to really see what is going on; it is out of focus; it is not clear what is going on; the title has misspellings that show a lack of attention.
This is just too abstract for my liking and is way too small to get an appreciation for what it is supposed to be. The spelling error in the title will probably lose you some score.
The obvious - Way small, blurry, and unrecognizable! Check out the LEARN area of DPC. The Tutorials and the "How'd they do that" sections are extremely helpful! I go there often!
PS - The misspelled word in your title doesn't help either.
Too small, too abstract. It's hard to even tell what this is because of the size, but it looks like a cool concept if it were executed better! I would encourage you to do a re-shoot! :)
Very interesting. The miss spelling is clever. I can hear the photo scream out to me with delight. The small out of focus photo challenges the imagination and dares the viewer to think outside of the box. Anybody that rates this photo less than a 10 doesn't understand your genious.
2 spelling errors in the title, and a small, out of focus image of an obscure body form. I think I can identify whats going on here, but really, who knows?
I hope I'm safe in assuming that this is one of your first submissions. I am basing the following critique on that assumption. The members here are big fans of photography and most have very large monitors to view their craft. An image this size is often criticized because it shows up as only slightly larger than a thumbnail and all detail is lost. Many members (myself included) encourage everyone to use the full 680 pixels they are alloted so that we can better see what it is you are shooting. As far as the image is concerned, it is out of focus and you can barely see your subject. That would be OK in a more abstract challenge, but since this one is "nude", the viewers expect to see a "nude" subject. Granted, the body does not have to be fully "exposed", but nudity should at the very least be implied. You should also check your spelling before submitting an image. There are times when spelling is not as important, but when it comes to titles of artwork, people are kind of picky.
probably somebody has commented on this before but:
1) it's "just"
2) it's "here"
3) this picture is wayyyyy too small. it's so small it's hard to criticize any other component of it other than its extreme smallness. if you need help resizing pictures to be the correct size or if you have any questions send me a message but i'd recommend checking out the "tutorials" section
I've spent at least 5 minutes trying to work this one out. I'm male and I'm not aware of anything on my body that resembles this. I've made an intimate study of the female anatomy as well and draw a blank on that score too. Please enlighten me.
A little on the small size ....don't suppose I'm the first to mention that. It's a good idea to use the full amount of pixels allowed so people can get a good look at your image.
Kudos on entering this challenge. Good luck with the next one.
I'm not sure what you are really trying to accomplish here. You picture is a little too blurry to see what it really is but maybe if it was a bit larger you could tell what is going on here. You can choose a picture up to 640 pixels so you might want to try that next time. Also you misspelled the word just. Good luck and keep it up. It takes a lot of practice to get to the top and I and still soooooo far away but my advice is from what I have learned. Good luck.
-J
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
