Challenge:Something New (Classic Editing) Camera:Kodak DX4900 Location: San Francisco, CA Date: Aug 10, 2002 Aperture: 4.0 ISO: 100 Shutter: 16 Date Uploaded: Aug 11, 2002
I'm sorry, yeah all of you people were right. I just posted it just for fun I guess. I could have fixed it up with a better title, but it's just... I don't know. I really should have considered a different photo because as you can see, this hardly has anything to do with something new. Thanks for all the feedback! (that was my first pic post ever =P)
This is one of those shots that I think is really good, but for the life of me I can't see the connection to the challenge. Please PM me if I'm missing something obvious and I will look at it again. ~ myqyl
Wow, you must be sooo much smarter than me! I don't get the new-ness at all! This is a great, interesting night shot. It seems high on the orange scale, which always makes me ask, HOW? The trace lights are great, focus is too! Still, the best I can go is 5. Swash
This picture, while visually interesting, doesnt seem to even vaguely meet the challenge. One tip, if your camera has manual white balance, try setting it. It can compensate for the harsh mercury vapor lamp colors, possibly adding something else to a similar photo.
This is a really great pic and I hope you try it again in another challenge, however, I'm not really seeing the "newness" in here. It could be stretched to say that street lights are new, or that "living the fast life" is a newer concept.
What the HECK doesn ANYTHING about this photo have to do with 'something new'? I wouldn't recommend it for disqualification, because perhaps I'm missing something, but heck if I can figure out what it is I'm missing.
It´s like you did forgot to send this in when the challenge was "night shot" or "Free study" I´m to stupid to see the "something new" in it sorry only gets 1 from me. But good picture thou!!!!!