Author Thread
11/03/2006 04:47:08 PMPost actions
3 Tens' really? I mean, with 90 1's, that's very interesting. Just shows everyone has an opinion.
11/02/2006 03:32:03 PMPost actions
WOW.. interessting voting going one here 90 x 1 thats unbelivably high! and 17 above 5 that to is unbelivable
11/02/2006 05:19:01 AMPost actions
Congrats on the brown ribbon!
Comments Made During the Challenge
10/31/2006 11:41:49 PMPost actions
I think a tripod, or at least bracing the camera on a pole or something should have been done to eliminate the blur.
10/31/2006 09:30:55 PMPost actions
that's just moved! terrible
10/31/2006 07:55:08 PMPost actions
the girls are a little out of focus.
10/30/2006 05:52:05 PMPost actions
10/29/2006 10:27:00 AMPost actions
10/28/2006 01:08:57 PMPost actions
This just feels to me like a pretty bad snapshot. Had the women been sharp and in focus and maybe a tighter crop given to the image you would have had a better image. As it is though it just feels messy.
10/28/2006 11:21:30 AMPost actions
camera shake doesn't equal bokeh in my books. looks as though it was a fun happy moment, though.
10/27/2006 06:24:02 PMPost actions
the entire image is out of focus
10/27/2006 05:33:43 PMPost actions
I dont like the composition in this picture. contrast? don't like it.... and this is blurry not showing bokeh. I'll give you a 2. Just one tip.. try not to center your pics
10/27/2006 02:57:37 PMPost actions
very blurry ... sorry ...
10/26/2006 06:30:20 PMPost actions
Bokeh doesn't mean camera shake... ;-)
10/26/2006 05:39:41 PMPost actions
It looks like you needed a tripod.
10/26/2006 03:42:18 PMPost actions
I'm not sure if the motion blur is intentional, but it doesn't really do the subject justice.
10/26/2006 12:52:04 PMPost actions
Entire Image appears to be out of focus.
10/25/2006 11:04:37 PMPost actions
10/25/2006 10:13:52 PMPost actions
After looks in focus as far as depth. However, everything is blurry due to motion blur. I don't see the intent here... Maybe use a tree or the ground as a steady platform. 2.
10/25/2006 09:30:30 PMPost actions
Wow - thats really bad - lots and lots of camera shake.
10/25/2006 06:27:16 PMPost actions
you need a tri-pod to handle the motion blur, I can't judge the bokeh.
10/25/2006 05:55:34 PMPost actions
This isn't bokeh, just blurry.
10/25/2006 05:14:38 PMPost actions
This is not a bokeh. It is a shaken image and, frankly, there's nothing good to tell about it.
10/25/2006 01:56:06 PMPost actions
there isn't 'anything' any focus... :(
10/25/2006 01:24:15 PMPost actions
this is just blurry as your shutter speed was too slow
10/25/2006 01:17:25 PMPost actions
Nothing is IN focus....Sorry!
10/25/2006 01:16:21 PMPost actions
Giggling while taking a long exposure hardly makes for bokeh.
10/25/2006 11:40:13 AMPost actions
not seeing bokeh, just blur.
10/25/2006 11:26:07 AMPost actions
//www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm DNMC, boken is not dof to me.
10/25/2006 11:10:24 AMPost actions
You might have been trying for "out of focus" using camera shake instead of DOF. I think your going to get reamed.
Artistically, this could be framed better - tighten in around your subjects. Everything else is just confusing. Is it a cityscape? Is it a playground? Is it a portrait? How do these elements interact?
10/25/2006 10:12:11 AMPost actions
I'm afraid that bokeh and motion blur are not one in the same... :/
10/25/2006 09:45:04 AMPost actions
Want fries with that shake?
10/25/2006 07:34:26 AMPost actions
Isn't something suppose to be in focus?
10/25/2006 01:41:51 AMPost actions
I can't see that there are any bokeh effects beyond the overpowering camera shake.