I like this picture even though I can't find the butterfly. Is it part of the blurry portion in the front? If so, clever! Hard on my eyes trying to find it, but still clever to blur the portion we're supposed to look for.
Sent you a note, but here's a hint for anyone else who's still looking.
Originally posted by howardj:
I'm probably missing something obvious, but I must admit I don't get it
To me the point of the challenge was to take a photo in the spirit of "Where's Waldo" -- where the subject is clearly visible, but hidden/camoflaged by the visual cacophony of tiny details.
I like this picture even though I can't find the butterfly. Is it part of the blurry portion in the front? If so, clever! Hard on my eyes trying to find it, but still clever to blur the portion we're supposed to look for.
Sorry but I voted this rather low, the image is just way way too busy for my taste and I can´t find any point that really draws my eye so you got a 3 from me, just thought I´d at least explain the low vote.
The quality of the black and white in this image is superb. It is a somewhat abstract composition that may not appeal to all viewers. It is always dangerous to have a lot of shallow focused detail in the foreground of an image and some viewers may vote it lower because of it.
The image is very appropriate for the challenge, though. For quite a bit of the time while I was lost I felt like I was in a very "thorny" situation. :) - Steve
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
