Author Thread
Post actions
I would like it bigger so I could see more detail. Because I like the idea but cannot tell if it actually looks any good. Kind of a mess.
Comments Made During the Challenge
Post actions
This is just an assault on my senses. Death is a fact of Wildlife, but I don't care to see it like this...
Post actions
I like how this looks like a salad
Post actions
Post actions
Nice photo, but I don't think it fits the category of "non-domesticated mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians"
Post actions
Way too small to be accurately judged. It really just ends up looking like a mess of a few feathers.
Post actions
th picture looks chaotic, cannot identify the subject
Post actions
I'm afraid that this will be voted down because of the size, you should use the 640 pixels that we are allowed to use in challenges.
Post actions
If the picture were a little larger, I would be able to get a better feel for what I am looking at.
Post actions
A pessimistic, but nonetheless realistic, definition of wildlife I have to agree. That said, this image is rather small (I doubt I'll be the only person to say that) so seeing the definition in the subject is very difficult. To be honest, without your title this would have had me very bemused.
Post actions
I really don't think that you have maximised the potential of this shot. You should aim for 640 for one side.
Post actions
Whites look a little blown to me.
Post actions
The photo is too small, and without the title would be nothing more than an abstract. Low score from me.
Post actions
Does not meet the challenge, which says:
Post actions
Image is a little small - it is difficult to see the details.
Post actions
Not the best use of this challenge.
Post actions
poof and then there was no more!
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
