2 - Oh, this has such good potential. Criticism; firstly the DOF is not that shallow, especially 'under' (on the upper right it seems better). If the angle were sharper, more detail/sharper at some point along a stem/etc, more selective cropping/framing, adjustment of 'blown white areas' and, as mentioned, a better depth of field, would all have made this much better in my opinion. Like to see a really sharp (perhaps 'down the stem view') angle/perspective on this. edit:typo
Message edited by author 2005-12-28 20:58:30. |