The man on the photo might be a playboy but the photo would surely not be put on the cover by Playboy. Another magazine title would fit a lot better (although it is a nice little joke).
I got it. This shot was taken by the Police Officer who pulled you over. :-)
Nice Job. Everything is nice and focused. I do not know about the Title. Could have really gotten a laugh out of a title like. "Citation"
I might be wrong, I'm not a reader, but I'm pretty sure Playboy actually has scantily clad women on the front, not the playboys who look at them! Nice shot of the man, but shiny forehead could have been dabbed with tissue first, woman's expression seems sort of mid change. Composition, with arm across bottom and glass at bottom left, is quite good.
The problem here, of course, is that so far as I know Playboy has never done a cover that didn't feature a single model, usually the centerfold model. You would have been better off with some other men's magazine.
Also, I would be more prone to think that on a men's magazine, "chick in a car" would be more likely than "couple" in a car, because, of course, guys want to believe they can have the chick and the car (it's a marketing gimmick).
I would have been more prone to buy this as some sort of celebrity-focus magazine even without it being a picture of recognizable celebrities.
I'm pretty sure this is not what the magazine is about. I don't think this fits... sorry bout that... In terms of a snapshot, hey it's nice... I'm sure the couple wouldn't mind having it on their wall...
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
