I'd just like to thank you for the nice comment you left for me.I can't believe i have met so many rude people all in one place.I appreciate nice coments like yours,shows you have class and respect for other people,thanx again,and have a nice day
I'm guessing by now you're probably getting beat up for your "richness of family" concept. It's not affecting my scoring process. I think it's a cute picture, but I think the blown highlights in the top right detract a lot from it. My eye keeps wandering back there.
Hmmm...cute indeed...but lets think about this...the challenge states "The opposite of the poverty challenge. Knock us out with your representation of material wealth" I know this is trying to step "out of the box" I suppose, I hate the term "out of the box", and I'm not a complete stickler for challnge descriptions but...if we go by what the challenge is seeking, this is what this image says to me...those without children are "poor" in a sense and a child is a "material" possesion...yes I understand what you are trying to convey but there is a difference between "think out of the box" and being no where close to said box...the art of thinking "out of the box" is being able to stay on topic, and not to change the topic the to fit in your own box.
The Affluence Challenge description says, "The opposite of the poverty challenge. Knock us out with your representation of MATERIAL WEALTH." This is a cut and paste message that I will comment on all submissions that do not seem to suit the topic of the challenge. Take note I understand this maybe just my personal opinion, and as such I only deducted 1 point from my original vote.