Thanks for all the comments, although I assure you that obscuring her head was distinctly on purpose : )
See this thread on Bridge photos for more details.
This took a little time to "get." I thought it one of the oddest bridge designs ever, and the overweight woman didn't seem to know where to take her "run" next. For once, a headless figure added to the fun. Finally, I realized that it was a diaper-chubby toddler on a playscape. If you didn't mean this to be amusing, it might be a good idea to analyze all the elements to see how they added to the "story."
I like this angle for viewing the bridge, other than it cutting off the kid's head. Is there another place to shoot from where the child could remain whole that's still aesthetically as pleasing to look at? I'm not sure, would be nice if there was.
Sharp as anything. I'm not too sure that this really works with the little one's head being hidden and the rail at the bottom right could do with being cropped out.
Why would you enter an image with such bright sunlight, intense shadows that don't add anythign to the design/balance/harmony of the image and then have an image with the head cut off of the main subject? Maybe shot over the head of the girl would have been better, and in the early morning adn not the mid-afternoon. This is the worst one in the bunch. 1
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
