Author Thread
Post actions
Love the expression on his face, excellent capture. Congratulations on your top 10 image.
Comments Made During the Challenge
Post actions
oh he's worth quite a bit more than that, say 6.000 as a guess of the peeps, and 6 from me.
Post actions
I've been up and down on this one. Settled on an eight. I love the subject and his expression, the lighting and tones. Not that crazy about the equipment. Guessing 6.2
Post actions
I think you underestimated yourself. 6
Post actions
That's great. I guess 6.5
Post actions
I agree, about 5.5 is my prediction. 6 from me.
Post actions
A good shot...it's a well done portrait. I think I would have liked to see a bit more context...but I think you'll do much better than your guess. 6.4
Post actions
Great image and better than your score guess. On point portrait
Post actions
For me, this image is a good one, but one notch below the best images in the challenge. I expect it to do about 5.8
Post actions
Haven't I seen him outside B&H? Nice portrait. Nice 4x5. 5.7
Post actions
Gorgeous tonality and very appealing portrait - underrated by yourself. An easy 6.5 and could be higher. I'll give it a boost with a seven.
Post actions
I gave it a six. Guessing a 5.678
Post actions
This is a great portrait. I'm sure it will do better. I predict 6.22.
Post actions
Nice street portrait in B&W. 5.78
Post actions
hmm, I voted 6 but it's hard to tell why I don't give a higher score. Technically there is nothing wrong with this pic, but it doesn't evoke feelings, his look is kind of neutral...
Post actions
Street photographer portrait street photography! Cool idea, great depth of focus for the close up and appropriate back ground blur. its nice and sharp and the overall composition is unique. I'll agree with your expectation and vote this at a seven Good Luck
Post actions
Post actions
Excellent portrait. A tighter crop to eliminate water drops gets a higher score. 6.576
Post actions
7 from me,,,,, ends probably close to 6,,,,,,,,
Post actions
Nice portrait. He appears to be an experienced photographer. 5.80
Post actions
Post actions
A mesmerizing tradesman portrait. Nothing less than a 6.0
Post actions
hard to say.
Post actions
Nice B&W photo. Too bad it doesn't look interesting. (only if the guy is famous) I'm sure it will score higher than your guess. 5.8
Post actions
Post actions
Very good portrait. The score is going to be much better than that (my 7 could help) - for me 6.15
Post actions
Post actions
Nice portrait. I like the warmth, the human connection, the composition, tones and the equipment which gives him context. Bumping up to seven, predicting 6.4433
Post actions
Crops a bit tight, it's sharp though, and interesting subject, I think your score is about right, maybe a little higher 5.67
Post actions
Great b&w. I estimate final score of 6.5
Post actions
Nice portrait great textures and very clear and sharp - 6.3
Post actions
Definitely not this is a wonderful portrait. I give it a 7
Post actions
Good capture of this fellow's character and you've handled the tones of the image well. 6.26
Post actions
I voted before looking at titles, now commenting.
Post actions
6.507 (I gave it a seven)
Post actions
I will bet the 5.4, I gave a 6 ...
Post actions
Nice detail. I will be back to see what camera you use. I like the processing. I predict 6.4.
Post actions
A well-lit and interesting portr(eight). DPC prediction: 6.333
Post actions
Post actions
One persons five point four is another persons ten.
Post actions
Hello, I voted a few days ago, now returning for comments. I think that you estimated your score well, I gave you a six but I think that you will finish at 5,5738
Post actions
OK Modest, frame-filling portrait. Nice tones.
Post actions
I love this photograph. Very very nice. For me 7
Post actions
I sure hope this one does better than a mid 5. Wonderful street portrait with lots of personality coming across.
Post actions
Post actions
you could be close tho I think nearer 6
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
