---
Thanks, Paul. I was wondering about that but I asked Robert before I submitted and he thought it would be OK. I am glad that this is the case.
Paul's comment:
"Just a quick note to say, although highly effective, this is a DQ-able edit (for the creation of new image features). It split SC opinion but the nature of the challenge meant that we felt that this was an understandable response to the challenge. Human discretion has won out.
Please don't use this image as a reference case to avoid future DQs in less specialised challenges though. (A general note, not specifically aimed at this photographer)."
Statistics
Place: 3 out of 74 Avg (all users): 7.0533 Avg (commenters): 8.7143 Avg (participants): 6.7317 Avg (non-participants): 7.4412 Views since voting: 2566 Views during voting: 208 Votes: 75 Comments: 17 Favorites: 2 (view)
Just a quick note to say, although highly effective, this is a DQ-able edit (for the creation of new image features). It split SC opinion but the nature of the challenge meant that we felt that this was an understandable response to the challenge. Human discretion has won out.
Please don't use this image as a reference case to avoid future DQs in less specialised challenges though. (A general note, not specifically aimed at this photographer).
Congrats on the yellow, Margaret. (And, oh, dang. I wanted to do a DAP pastel treatment on something but thought it might have been a step too far in advanced.)
Fisherman with a Seagull
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
