upon 2nd thought this shot and the whole idea was a bad.
but i had nothing elce
it was suposed to be part of definition #1 of "part" and all of definition #2 since not having the end to definition#1 is exactaly described in definition to "part but not all of something". henc "Part of 1 all of 2
But ppl didn't seem to get it.(what can u do?)
+to make things worse i couldn't do what i origenaly wanted to, so i had to scratch off (w/an razorblade) the part of the deffinition i wanted have missing.not what i had in mind but what is done is done...
Statistics
Place: 396 out of 436 Avg (all users): 4.0787 Avg (commenters): 4.3750 Avg (participants): 3.8387 Avg (non-participants): 4.4107 Views since voting: 803 Views during voting: 353 Votes: 267 Comments: 8 Favorites: 0
I suspect no photo of a dictionary definition will ever do well here unless there is something else going on. In this case, I see the disctionary page as "part" of the frame. Add points for creativity. The words (and the page itself) look flat. Not enough here to hold my interest (deduct points). And the title is confusing (deduct points). I'm relatively new at this so these are just opinions. Sorry to seem negative.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
