Yes, it's a blatant shoehorn. I would probably give it a low vote myself. Just an experiment to see how far I can push a concept. Expecting lots of comments and a low commenter's average out of this. Should be a fun week.
Post-challenge notes:
Plenty of lowball votes for the shoehorn, but it looks like even more people simply gave me the benefit of the doubt of a neutral 5. I've seen more blatant shoehorns score near the top, however. I'm sure this wouldhave done decently in a more appropriate challenge.
Didn't brown-out, but you guys really disappointed me when it came to blasting me with critical comments.
Statistics
Place: 95 out of 105 Avg (all users): 4.3944 Avg (commenters): 6.0000 Avg (participants): 4.0980 Avg (non-participants): 4.5604 Views since voting: 486 Views during voting: 252 Votes: 142 Comments: 5 Favorites: 0
No critial comments, but I did give you a "1" if that helps. I only blasted (nicely) the real shoehorns. Yours was more of a "hmmmm, what? why?" than a shoehorn :).
I like this. I'm sure others will say (or at least think) DNMC because it's not something "you" collect. But, I find it to fit the challenge quite well. Nice job with the interpretation and the processing.