Author Thread
06/08/2009 07:46:34 AMPost actions · #1
Mak and I tied for 24th place in the May Free Study.
We both received 133 votes with a final score of 6.41820300751 with these entries.
MAK
Judi
I don't understand why we were split in places....but I thought the final score was quite incredible. This certainly doesn't happen too often....right down to the last decimal place.
So MAK....what happened to ladies before gentleman....you pushed in...LMAO!
06/08/2009 07:50:54 AMPost actions · #2
Very rude of MAK to push in :)
06/08/2009 09:20:49 AMPost actions · #3
Judi, it was probably decided by that 1 I gave you.
06/08/2009 05:48:27 PMPost actions · #4
Originally posted by Simms:
Judi, it was probably decided by that 1 I gave you.
You asswipe....you will keep....lmao!
06/08/2009 05:57:36 PMPost actions · #5
I bet it's because Marac's imageID is lower. Next time don't spend so much time editing! :P
06/08/2009 06:00:16 PMPost actions · #6
It's because you threw in too much red, Judi. Reduce red saturation by .1 in the foreground and gain .000001 in score, I guarantee it!
R.
06/08/2009 06:07:50 PMPost actions · #7
I think they let the baby ape in ahead of the landscape. It's so cute, how could you hurt its feelings by making it second to a field of grass? ;)
06/08/2009 06:09:01 PMPost actions · #8
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
It's because you threw in too much red, Judi. Reduce red saturation by .1 in the foreground and gain .000001 in score, I guarantee it!
R.
Interesting concept. LOL!
And Yanko....you probably are right...that was a last minute entry...unusual for me!
06/08/2009 06:15:31 PMPost actions · #9
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
It's because you threw in too much red, Judi. Reduce red saturation by .1 in the foreground and gain .000001 in score, I guarantee it!
R.
Interesting concept. LOL!
It ain't a concept, I know it for a fact: I loved the shot but thought the red foreground was just too extreme, so it cost you a point in my book :-))
R.
06/08/2009 06:17:30 PMPost actions · #10
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
It's because you threw in too much red, Judi. Reduce red saturation by .1 in the foreground and gain .000001 in score, I guarantee it!
R.
Interesting concept. LOL!
It ain't a concept, I know it for a fact: I loved the shot but thought the red foreground was just too extreme, so it cost you a point in my book :-))
R.
It doesn't show that red on my screen....and that's how it prints out too.
06/08/2009 06:58:43 PMPost actions · #11
It was Marac's birthday present. How nice of you, Judy!
06/08/2009 07:31:53 PMPost actions · #12
its quite cozy actually being all squashed up with Judi
06/08/2009 09:46:22 PMPost actions · #13
Users with Cameras scores are weighted higher OR Tie goes to the Monkey