whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd?
Because it was not stipulated to be a DQable offence....but it is now! We can't change the rules of the past...but we can change the rules of the future.
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second.
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second.
I guess I did not see the diff with the old description of
Description
Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 2 seconds
and the new one of:
Challenge Details: Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 1 seconds.
whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd?
Because (until now) "DNMC" was not grounds for DQ.
EDIT: Wow, you guys are fast. :-)
Ah, I'm still pretty new at this--so I give people the benefit of the doubt. I assume that their photos meet the challenge (even if it's through someone's warped point of view :) But having a first place completely ignore the challenge description boggles my mind. Oh well, I'll also return money if they give me too much change.
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second.
I guess I did not see the diff with the old description of
Description
Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 2 seconds
and the new one of:
Challenge Details: Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 1 seconds.
I'm such an idiot. I did not notice:
Extra Rules: This time, your entry will be disqualified if you do not use shutter speed of 1 second
Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ??
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol!
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ??
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol!
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R.
Im worried about it! hahah. Mine did the same thing. Maybe they will round it off?
Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ??
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol!
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R.
Hmm. I think if that's a real technical issue, then we're looking at a real disaster of biblical proportions. Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together. MASS HYSTERIA!
Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ??
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol!
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R.
Im worried about it! hahah. Mine did the same thing. Maybe they will round it off?
Well considering you can't (as far as I am aware) set your camera for .997 seconds...I think you should be okay.
