Since I couldnt ignore this one nasty bright hot pixel in the new camera sensor, I thought lets share it and lets all have some fun.
So heres a recent picture. All you have to do is spot the hot pixel and report its co-ordinates (X, Y):
The first one to report the correct numbers shall receive Prash's good eyes (virtual) trophy. You may not use a hot-pixel-finder software (hard to enforce, but I trust you;-), there are no other rules.
The time starts... NOW.
P.S. In case someone wants to make this thread more interesting, you can post your own hot-pixellated image here after this one. Just a hint.
ETA: The co-ordinates must be in full / original image resolution space.
I'll hazard a guess at 2675, 1842 but you really shouldn't worry about a single pixel, nokin certainly won't care.
Wow! You came reallly close. Only that this is a vertically oriented image, so considering top left of the image as the origin, the co-ordinates are different.
TY, TY... I feel so humble to have reached this peak of greatness.
Brings up an interesting question, though: I am viewing at maximum magnification, and the hot pixel maps, horizontally, to the space between 2675 and 2676, while the vertical maps to the space between 2448 and 2449: so is there a convention for naming this location? My use of the .5 markers locates the center of the hot pixel, but when the maximum possible resolution is 1 pixel, it seems silly to be using half-pixel markers...
TY, TY... I feel so humble to have reached this peak of greatness.
Brings up an interesting question, though: I am viewing at maximum magnification, and the hot pixel maps, horizontally, to the space between 2675 and 2676, while the vertical maps to the space between 2448 and 2449: so is there a convention for naming this location? My use of the .5 markers locates the center of the hot pixel, but when the maximum possible resolution is 1 pixel, it seems silly to be using half-pixel markers...
R.
Yes you make a good point. We really dont need to go sub pixel unless we are interpolating. In this case, (X: 2675, Y: 2449) would suffice for me.
TY, TY... I feel so humble to have reached this peak of greatness.
Brings up an interesting question, though: I am viewing at maximum magnification, and the hot pixel maps, horizontally, to the space between 2675 and 2676, while the vertical maps to the space between 2448 and 2449: so is there a convention for naming this location? My use of the .5 markers locates the center of the hot pixel, but when the maximum possible resolution is 1 pixel, it seems silly to be using half-pixel markers...
R.
top left pixel is typically pixel 0,0 (you use the upper left corner to identify them)
And here I've been trying to analyze all of my images using the standard Cartesian coordinate system! No wonder I can't take a decent picture! I've been upside down and backwards this whole time!
eta: For what it's worth, though, I zoomed all the way in on the image and the pixel is dead center on 2675 and 2449 in CS3. This is using the rulers on the edge of the window. I agree that there shouldn't be a half pixel location for a hot pixel.
