This is frustrating. This is what I get for using a subject matter that doesn't scream "This photo meets challenge criteria" The photo meets the criteria on so many levels its sickening. It's also technically sound. I have past challenge photos with a much higher score, with less challenge credibility and huge problems technically. What's next? Probably a DNMC in the next open study!
More ranting later in the week when I can discuss specifics. (after the challenge is over) I usually don't get to fired up over these scores, but I can't help it today. I should go exercise!!
Okay! I know 5.0500 is not a bad score, but compared to my expectation and the work I put into the photo it is disappointing. I feel better now. I'm having a bad day! Thanks for listening.
This is frustrating. This is what I get for using a subject matter that doesn't scream "This photo meets challenge criteria" The photo meets the criteria on so many levels its sickening. It's also technically sound.
I'm glad I'm not alone. If the first day is any indication, this is shaping up to be a personal-worst score, and I thought it might have been a personal-best...
Votes: 55
Views: 87
Avg Vote: 4.1818
Comments: 3
The three comments basically say "wow, this is crap!" ;) Okay, not in so many words, but that's what they feel like.
I think where we got burned was trying to follow the instructions to 'find a *creative* way to photograph the concept of "even".' Apparently "creative" is not part of the pat formula to get high marks here. Sorry, I digress... Time to go take a walk.
