Regardless of one's politics, this is a photography site afterall. The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary. She is as underhanded as as they come and will stoop to any depth, including putting out Obama's photo in traditional Muslim dress. SHE is a piece of work.
Regardless of one's politics, this is a photography site afterall. The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary. She is as underhanded as as they come and will stoop to any depth, including putting out Obama's photo in traditional Muslim dress. SHE is a piece of work.
Rush Limbaugh told us about this would happen couple of weeks ago. Funny how predictable politic is LOL
Regardless of one's politics, this is a photography site afterall. The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary. She is as underhanded as as they come and will stoop to any depth, including putting out Obama's photo in traditional Muslim dress. SHE is a piece of work.
Obama put himself in traditional Islamic dress when he visited Africa.
As for stooping to any depths, I don't think the actions of either democratic candidate can hold a candle the Machiavellian actions to which the Republicans have sunk.
Many years ago when OJ trial going on, I think one of the papers (might be NY Post or NY Times) put OJ's picture much more darker skin then he already is. The reason is unknown, but maybe they made it look like a racial issue against him.
Many years ago when OJ trial going on, I think one of the papers (might be NY Post or NY Times) put OJ's picture much more darker skin then he already is. The reason is unknown, but maybe they made it look like a racial issue against him.
According to the article posted it was to make Obama (and/or OJ) look more sinister.
My question, is darker skin more sinister? Who says so? And why?
The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary.
You mean other than the fact she's a Democrat?
See...there you go again thinking you know me. I have a nephew in college that I encouraged to research Obama and determine if he might want to support him. The involvement of politics is improtant at that age and Obama seems to have a knack for getting young folks into the process. That is a good thing in my opinion.
As far as Hillary being a Democrat - she is only one in name. Her positions are actually more central or even right leaning than Obama's - however, she is a snake of the highest degree. I wouldn't vote for her if she were a Libertarian/Republican/ or any other party. And I suspect a lot of democrats won't either - come November.
The purpose of the post was to give yet another example of how devious she is. Some may of course disagree. Although I find it hard to imagine that anyone would disagree with me.
The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary.
You mean other than the fact she's a Democrat?
See...there you go again thinking you know me. I have a nephew in college that I encouraged to research Obama and determine if he might want to support him. The involvement of politics is improtant at that age and Obama seems to have a knack for getting young folks into the process. That is a good thing in my opinion.
As far as Hillary being a Democrat - she is only one in name. Her positions are actually more central or even right leaning than Obama's - however, she is a snake of the highest degree. I wouldn't vote for her if she were a Libertarian/Republican/ or any other party. And I suspect a lot of democrats won't either - come November.
The purpose of the post was to give yet another example of how devious she is. Some may of course disagree. Although I find it hard to imagine that anyone would disagree with me.
;-}
Obama makes a lot of promises, but I have yet to see any details. I think he's a great speaker with an inspiring message of hope but with little experiences and scant details on how to achieve all he wishes for.
$hit in one hand, wish in the other. See which fills up first.
At least, McCain and Clinton have experience.
They're both experienced politicians and both are snakes of the same degree.
uh.. I suppose it was an attempt to awaken the inner racists we all are subconciously(?!) seriously.. that's the only explanation I can come up with.. but then we saw the 'hillary looks horrible and old' pictures as well.. both are attacking each others unique points trying to make them a problem rather then an asset. His race and her gender..
and wth was the 'obama wearing african clothes' thing .. doesn't every one have 'I'm being a silly tourist and doing it as the locals do it' pics somewhere.. people can push the weirdest issues..
Really dosen't matter who wins in my op. If anybody thinks anything is going to change there nuts. Why you ask ? heres an example.
How could America not know we are running low on oil, after all it's right there in the ground Alaska, Texas, and a few other states. A simple measurment would have told us we were in trouble, problem is all the DIP STICKS are in Washington. :).
[quote=Flash] They're both experienced politicians and both are snakes of the same degree.
I respect your right to see it that way, but there is a severe distinction to me. Never would I compare John McCain to Hillary in "snakiness". I wouldn't even compare Rev Al Sharpton to Hillary in snakiness and he is pretty snaky. But those are just my opinions.
The Obama factor for me is the pure sense that people are involved. Yes there are questions regarding ability - as there are with all candidates untill they are vetted. But for pure "get involved" enthusiasm for the political process, it has been decades since this kind of inspiration has been evident. Regardless of whether I agree or disagree with some of his positions. Quite the contrary for Hillary.
I find it very illuminating that many persons who have had personal political dealings with the Clintons, are very eager to endorse someone else. Listen to the adjectives used to describe her and her campaign. Even peolple who have a fondness for Bill, find it difficult to like Hillary. She is an evil spirited person. Evidenced by her willingness to play the race card (multiple times) all while courting the very people she is dissing. Her behavior should be evidence alone of the historical existence of Judas.
Many years ago when OJ trial going on, I think one of the papers (might be NY Post or NY Times) put OJ's picture much more darker skin then he already is. The reason is unknown, but maybe they made it look like a racial issue against him.
I have worked for a newspaper before and understand how easy it is to get the levels wrong on an image and cause it to turn out too dark. If one monitor is off you can really mess things up...
I have worked for a newspaper before and understand how easy it is to get the levels wrong on an image and cause it to turn out too dark. If one monitor is off you can really mess things up...
I agree with that too. If any single group of people should have any knowledge about screwing up levels it would be us. ;)
I screw levels up all the time (especially with the frequency with which I change computers) and would never be so bold as to level that accusation against the Clinton camp. No matter how true it may be.
