On my profile list it is listed as 6, no .000's at all. Just came to my attention when i was looking at progression of my scores. Anyone else got this seeming anomaly on one of their entries? Obviously it happens from time to time, but with scores worked out to the 1/1000th it must be a rare occurrence...
In my portfolio it is listed as "6" (with no zeros) but when you pull up the picture all of the zeros are there. I suspect the same applies to everyone else.
By random chance, one in every 10,000 entries should have a rating ending with all zeros. There have been almost 800 challenges thus far. Assuming 100-200 entries per challenge, there should be 80,000 to 160,000 entries. This means there should be 80 to 160 photos on this site with an integer score.
In my portfolio it is listed as "6" (with no zeros) but when you pull up the picture all of the zeros are there. I suspect the same applies to everyone else.
By random chance, one in every 10,000 entries should have a rating ending with all zeros. There have been almost 800 challenges thus far. Assuming 100-200 entries per challenge, there should be 80,000 to 160,000 entries. This means there should be 80 to 160 photos on this site with an integer score.
That is skewed tho considering the majority of shots will fall within the 4.5-6.5 barrier (that is an arbitrary guess not statistical knowledge), thus having more of a chance of hitting integer values. WOW - did i just use integer, arbitrary and statistical in one sentence!
By random chance, one in every 10,000 entries should have a rating ending with all zeros. There have been almost 800 challenges thus far. Assuming 100-200 entries per challenge, there should be 80,000 to 160,000 entries. This means there should be 80 to 160 photos on this site with an integer score.
That is skewed tho considering the majority of shots will fall within the 4.5-6.5 barrier (that is an arbitrary guess not statistical knowledge), thus having more of a chance of hitting integer values. WOW - did i just use integer, arbitrary and statistical in one sentence!
I don't think that's true. The integer is irrelevant; all that matters is the chance of the 4 digits following the integer all being zero, so that's 10x10x10x10=10,000 combinations, as Erik said.
