I'm not complaining but I am curious why this challenge entry (which scored in the bottom third of the pack in a very small challenge ... 90 entries I think) has attracted so many views ... over 1,200 at last count. Can anyone shed any light?
Also sometimes a photo will get picked up by Digg and that will generate a lot of views.
Is there anyway to tell if it got "picked up?" Oh, and I'm possibly the last one on the planet to not know what Digg is. What's Digg?
just a website where people link to stuff they digg (like). if your shot gets linked then it gets more views. you can search google with your name and see what comes up.
I think you guys are just being cynical. People aren't only roaming the 'net looking for nudie photos.
I think this photo has been viewed so many times because there are so many cultured photographers and travelers using the internet these days, and let's face it, Florence is a beautiful city...
I think you guys are just being cynical. People aren't only roaming the 'net looking for nudie photos.
I think this photo has been viewed so many times because there are so many cultured photographers and travelers using the internet these days, and let's face it, Florence is a beautiful city...
seriously? choose 10 random photos from the nude category and see if they have a normal number of views. the nude category gets 10 times more views.
edit to add some proof:
lets look at some gallery stats
Nature
32,474 photos
101,946 views <--------3.14 avg views per shot
Nude
2,089 photos
946,453 views <--------453.07 views per shot
I think you guys are just being cynical. People aren't only roaming the 'net looking for nudie photos.
I think this photo has been viewed so many times because there are so many cultured photographers and travelers using the internet these days, and let's face it, Florence is a beautiful city...
seriously? choose 10 random photos from the nude category and see if they have a normal number of views. the nude category gets 10 times more views.
edit to add some proof:
lets look at some gallery stats
Nature
32,474 photos
101,946 views <--------3.14 avg views per shot
Nude
2,089 photos
946,453 views <--------453.07 views per shot
LMAO nice work on the stats even if it is the truth ;)
Thanks all for shedding the light. It's up to 1,313 today. Maybe I'll have to tag nude cars, and nude airplanes, and nude motorcycles ... heck, nude green peppers. Probably nobody will Digg those.
Thanks all for shedding the light. It's up to 1,313 today. Maybe I'll have to tag nude cars, and nude airplanes, and nude motorcycles ... heck, nude green peppers. Probably nobody will Digg those.
I assume your joking but just incase you don't know it is against the rules to put non nudes int her. I should know i tried:)
Thanks all for shedding the light. It's up to 1,313 today. Maybe I'll have to tag nude cars, and nude airplanes, and nude motorcycles ... heck, nude green peppers. Probably nobody will Digg those.
I assume your joking but just incase you don't know it is against the rules to put non nudes int her. I should know i tried:)
I was joking. But thanks for the reminder.
Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?
Well I think so Brain, but putting clothes on an airplane? It's all too much work.
Sometimes the thumbnail indicates a great image, but once opened they realize an obvious flaw (like OOF or artifacts). I think your thumbnail looks quite promising, but once opened it is another story. That is my guess.
