DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> Tiny Birds
⏮️⏪◀️ 1/1 ▶️⏩⏭️
Showing posts 1 - 20 of 20, (reverse)
AuthorThread
10/23/2003 03:30:55 PM · #1
Who says birds don't have lips? You can clearly see here that they do!


10/23/2003 03:33:17 PM · #2
Nice!
What did you use to get that shot a Canon 300mm or 400mm IS lens :) ?
Real nice.

Calvus
10/23/2003 03:39:00 PM · #3
75-300 IS :) ..

I like the black and white version except that I can't see his lips that well.

Anyone able to do a b&w conversion that would show the lips better?


10/23/2003 06:00:24 PM · #4
no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-))
10/23/2003 06:09:41 PM · #5
I'm no channel mixer guru but here is my attempt.
10/23/2003 06:12:32 PM · #6
Originally posted by Konador:

I'm no channel mixer guru but here is my attempt.



LOL that's priceless
10/23/2003 06:13:18 PM · #7
thats funny konador

10/23/2003 06:16:29 PM · #8
Originally posted by Konador:

I'm no channel mixer guru but here is my attempt.


Who's lips are those Angelina Jolie, or Mick Jagger? That image made my day. Great job Konador.

Message edited by author 2003-10-23 18:16:51.
10/23/2003 06:26:37 PM · #9
That is hilarious!

Nice work. Two Atta Boys.


Calvus


Originally posted by Konador:

I'm no channel mixer guru but here is my attempt.

10/23/2003 06:30:31 PM · #10
Still love this classic bird short.



10/23/2003 06:49:39 PM · #11
my poor little tiny baby birdy.

MUTATED!




10/23/2003 06:51:16 PM · #12
Well at least now it can explore different styles of music instead of boring old whistling. You'd better re-enforce your windows before it starts singing Pavarotti!

Message edited by author 2003-10-23 18:51:43.
10/23/2003 06:53:33 PM · #13
judging from the positive reaction to ben's edit, we should completely open EDITING :-))


10/23/2003 06:55:33 PM · #14
Yay, mutated animals galore!

10/23/2003 07:03:27 PM · #15
Anyone ever do a "Blinky" from the Simpsons? The 3 eyed fish. Konador?
10/23/2003 07:36:10 PM · #16
Originally posted by magnetic9999:

no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-))


I am no guru but I have been playing around with the channels lately so here is my attempt. Not fantastic but it's the best I can do :)

//www.tomlewis.btinternet.co.uk/untitled.jpg
10/23/2003 07:39:18 PM · #17
wow tomlewis! that is vastly improved over mine. what settings did you use?

Originally posted by tomlewis1980:

Originally posted by magnetic9999:

no channel mixer gurus wanna give it a shot? :-))


I am no guru but I have been playing around with the channels lately so here is my attempt. Not fantastic but it's the best I can do :)

//www.tomlewis.btinternet.co.uk/untitled.jpg

10/23/2003 07:50:38 PM · #18
I normally use the green channel when B&W a photo, as in most digital cameras the green has the least noise. Unfortunately there wasn't much contrast on the green channel, so I ran the image through a demo of neat image ( //www.neatimage.com/ ). Opened in PS, then in the channel mixer I set the red channel to approx. 120%, green to 0% and blue to approx. -20%. Then auto contrast and slight sharpening.
10/23/2003 08:35:59 PM · #19
cool.

one thing i dont understand is why you ran it thru neatimage? was there too much noise in the red channel without it?
10/23/2003 09:49:09 PM · #20
Originally posted by magnetic9999:

cool.

one thing i dont understand is why you ran it thru neatimage? was there too much noise in the red channel without it?


Same editing but without neatimage. Makes quite a difference :) I think this is because the red and blue are the noisiest channels and setting one to negative and one to positive in the channel mixer increases the contrast between them.
⏮️⏪◀️ 1/1 ▶️⏩⏭️
Current Server Time: 09/27/2026 10:33:11 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.