Author Thread
Post actions #1
Simply, it's about time for the Site Council to investigate the voting behavior of the teams. Don't warn them. Just audit their votes. I'd especially check the first 50 votes on any recent challenge.
Post actions #2
They already do this, remember the VERY public example of Rikki being banned and all the challenges he entered being recalculated?
Post actions #3
Whew... I hope some gang comes along and gives me some voyes, I sure could use them. :-)
Post actions #4
LMAO Gangs?? We're only "teams" on paper and gang-voting is a bit of a conspiracy theroy, don't you think? Besides, WPL isn't even running right now.
Post actions #5
Not running for any polictical office.But I approve this message....
Post actions #6
Hey, Cindi, where are those ghost votes you promised me? :-P
Post actions #7
Sorry, Leeroy. I was busy with some covert gang activity and forgot to start ghost accounts for vote skewing! :/
Post actions #8
it seems like every few days a thread like this pops up. to piggy-back what steve said, they already check for patterens like this. first of all 6 votes can not swing power that much and nto all members on all teams are good enough friends to even talk about cheating so it wouldn't even be that many votes. on my team otehr than my wife there is only 1 person that i really talk to and both of them won't vote on my entrys if they know what they are or recognize me. there is no fire here move along.
Post actions #9
Why would you say that? Are there people winning that you don't think deserve it? I see the top 20 being pretty much were they should be..of course I don't like some of them and think maybe 1st place should have been 10th place but still think they should be in the top 10. Now if there was some voting that was being cheated on then I think we would start seeing crappy pictures in the top 20, but there isn't.
Post actions #10
Originally posted by Sonifo:
Now if there was some voting that was being cheated on then I think we would start seeing crappy pictures in the top 20, but there isn't.
Post actions #11
i dont see any of the gang members winning ribbons. most of them dont even make it into the top 20.
Post actions #12
If I know who a particular entry belongs to, I don't vote on it. That solves that.
Post actions #13
Hey OP it is like a Fart who ever smelt it dealt it! You got something to hide?
Post actions #14
I got a top 20 this week, but I'm a gang leader ;)
Post actions #15
Originally posted by karmabreeze:
If I know who a particular entry belongs to, I don't vote on it. That solves that.
Post actions #16
so how do you initiate? break their cameras instead of their knee caps? beat them with their tri-pods? well?? well???
Originally posted by idnic:
I got a top 20 this week, but I'm a gang leader ;)
Post actions #17
do gang-members know other gang-members' entries?
Post actions #18
Site Council can't investigate anybody's voting behaviour. Only drew/langdon can do that.
Post actions #19
Originally posted by biteme:
do gang-members know other gang-members' entries?
Post actions #20
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by biteme:
do gang-members know other gang-members' entries?
Post actions #21
Post actions #22
Average vote on my entries during WPL2: 6.238
Post actions #23
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Average vote on my entries during WPL2: 6.238
Post actions #24
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Average vote on my entries during WPL2: 6.238
Post actions #25
Originally posted by scarbrd:
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Average vote on my entries during WPL2: 6.238
