has anyone noticed how fast threads are disappearing off of the front page? it's like there are so many new threads that the poor site just can't keep up. intriguing.
are you serious or joking? I think "the mill" and "clark foam" both appear rather processed. I doubt "clark foam" was really all that yellow originally, neither did " the mill" look quite so dark and moody I suspect. They are both absolutely beautiful but I doubt they are very natural.
are you serious or joking? I think "the mill" and "clark foam" both appear rather processed. I doubt "clark foam" was really all that yellow originally, neither did " the mill" look quite so dark and moody I suspect. They are both absolutely beautiful but I doubt they are very natural.
Well, I meant that most of the images were limitted in processing. :-)
are you serious or joking? I think "the mill" and "clark foam" both appear rather processed. I doubt "clark foam" was really all that yellow originally, neither did " the mill" look quite so dark and moody I suspect. They are both absolutely beautiful but I doubt they are very natural.
has anyone noticed how fast threads are disappearing off of the front page? it's like there are so many new threads that the poor site just can't keep up. intriguing.
Can I suggest that we have two columns of most recent threads instead of one. Most people only look at the thread title...so for front page reference only divide the space into two columns...it means the threads stay on there a little longer which means less bumping and jumping and eventual falling!
has anyone noticed how fast threads are disappearing off of the front page? it's like there are so many new threads that the poor site just can't keep up. intriguing.
I blame the peas. Ever since they came on, the site has been so sluggish. Pea-ked or something.
