I have a rather low number of comments too. (2 for 69 votes) But this is probably my fault. My subject, though well composed and in good focus, does not make for a show-stopping image... nothing much to comment on! (seems like I have had this problem lately)
Still, the ratio for everyone does seem a bit on the low side.
83 votes Low Score for a picture that I personally think is well taken, but with a lousy title.(confuses people a lot) Only 3 comments. Guess I should learn a couple of things in the area of what not to do.
Originally posted by ganders: ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no.
Man, that hurts doesn't it. Same story here. With only one or two exceptions, my scores with my "little" camera were much better than with my new one. I just explain it away by saying that I am still "learning" the new one.
(This comment was actually from karmat, didn't realize the default was set to hubby nards656 - sorry!)
* This message has been edited by the author on 11/18/2002 10:56:16 PM.
Originally posted by ganders: ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no.
Well my scrappy, scratched and battered HP C20 is doing better than the average I've been able to eek out of my G2 in the past year, so there is no accounting for camera quality :)
Probably because you're not too worried about playing the settings on the camera rather than just getting a nice photo, i.e. interesting perspective or composition :)
Originally posted by Gordon: Originally posted by ganders: [i]ONE comment off of 81 votes.
And I'm not saying anything about my score. I just hoped that my shiny new Minolta would give me a better score than my crappy old camera but oh no.
Well my scrappy, scratched and battered HP C20 is doing better than the average I've been able to eek out of my G2 in the past year, so there is no accounting for camera quality :) [/i]
