I have been watching the thread on Troll voting with interest, as I am sure a number of you have.
I am not trying to open this up for continued discussion , merely to point out that this system is designed to place us up, to be judged by our peers and equals, just like the jury system in a court room.
It makes me wonder about the potential of a Troll voting Juror… or have I been reading too many John Grisham novels
No, you've been reading the US Supreme Court, Gore v Bush
Isn't that on the late night Adult channel......
Probably not since the FCC crackdown ... I've been thinking for a while that the Administration could easily bankrupt C-Span by just sending Dick Cheney on a whirlwind tour of the Democratic side of the Senate floor.
No, you've been reading the US Supreme Court, Gore v Bush
Isn't that on the late night Adult channel......
Probably not since the FCC crackdown ... I've been thinking for a while that the Administration could easily bankrupt C-Span by just sending Dick Cheney on a whirlwind tour of the Democratic side of the Senate floor.
what you need is the British Parliamentry approach, were the two sides are divided two swords distance ( for Safety).
I think the simple invention by Samual Colt could sort that one ......
I agree. I believe this threads have more substance simply because no one takes themselves seriously. The moment we do, we sound like idiots because we huff and puff to lay out our half ass believes and philosophies and nobody listens because of the litany that must regurgitated. Look at the political threads, they are indeed waste basket material.
I very much doubt that half of what we carry is of any true value. We simply subdivide and gather about a hub and attack the other hubs. At the end we are no better off. Most of us simply delude ourselves in believing that we know the true answers. We believe whatever, simply to be able to live with ourselves.
At least in humor it shows that indeed we are derivative of one central hub. We see our insignificance and see the folly in our hearts brcause we are indeed free to gravitate to the inasinty we choose.
I see them. Voter (a) says I am going to vote this image a 9. Voter
(b) replies, a 9. That image stinks. It is flat and out of focus.
Voter (a) replies. I know, but I have to keep my average vote score above 5.
Voter (b) My score is 3.99 and that is a trollers score. I never knew how you kept the average above 5. Got it. This explains to the unitiated how a rotten image gets a 10.
Voter(a) sometimes those ten come from close friends and family member helping the genius.
