Perhaps the topic is about what one likes to photograph or one's comfort zone type of recurrent images. Style? Do we have a style?
First definition of style is: a manner of doing something.
I might be wrong but I think I have no style.
“Style is besides the point. Nobody would pay attention if one always said the same thing, in the same words and the same tone of voice.” Pablo Picasso
Picasso, schlimasso. Style is something else entirely.
mariuca certainly has a style in my book: I can usually tell. If I could define it I would be much wiser than I already am.
Originally posted by mariuca:
Perhaps the topic is about what one likes to photograph or one's comfort zone type of recurrent images. Style? Do we have a style?
First definition of style is: a manner of doing something.
I might be wrong but I think I have no style.
“Style is besides the point. Nobody would pay attention if one always said the same thing, in the same words and the same tone of voice.” Pablo Picasso
Perhaps the topic is about what one likes to photograph or one's comfort zone type of recurrent images. Style? Do we have a style?
First definition of style is: a manner of doing something.
I might be wrong but I think I have no style.
“Style is besides the point. Nobody would pay attention if one always said the same thing, in the same words and the same tone of voice.” Pablo Picasso
The polite term would be "eclectic", the more common description is "Random".
Though there are some things that tend to recur in my photos:
Bicycles
Military aircraft
Strong wideangle perspectives
Slight vignettes to help steer the viewers eye to the subject
Regular usage of Tonemapping/structure (I've become more subtle with this over time, however)
Not sure how these would be labeled as a style, though.
