This is my entry
I actually shot that temple as a full 360 spherical panorama with 26 individual frames, but only selected about 9 central ones to stitch the resulting image. Here is a full version converted to a "tiny planet"
It probably would've scored a bit higher, but I was afraid to enter it since I thought it might be deemed illegal under Standard ruleset. According to glad2badad, it is legal. Oh well, live and learn ))
Your entry is really good but I would have voted higher for the outtake. However I've never understood why it's legal in advanced.
It's actually a panoramic image with a much higher number of captured images to produce it (the ones I've done also used 26 images).
An entry by MargaretNet was one I watched initially, right around the time I'd purchased my drone. She produced the following image using a standard, more challenging process, capturing the images from a tripod and then stitching them together.
Thought I'd give it a try with this entry back in January and had a lot of fun figuring out how to put it together.
Your entry is really good but I would have voted higher for the outtake. However I've never understood why it's legal in advanced.
It is legal because allowing "some" distortion/perspective correction is necessary, and it is now left up to the voters (not SC) to decide how much is "too much" of any effects. If you think any effect has been over-applied feel free to vote accordingly.
Your entry is really good but I would have voted higher for the outtake. However I've never understood why it's legal in advanced.
It is legal because allowing "some" distortion/perspective correction is necessary, and it is now left up to the voters (not SC) to decide how much is "too much" of any effects. If you think any effect has been over-applied feel free to vote accordingly.
But to my mind there's a difference between correction and alteration. All these examples create a perspective that doesn't exist.
Your entry is really good but I would have voted higher for the outtake. However I've never understood why it's legal in advanced.
It is legal because allowing "some" distortion/perspective correction is necessary, and it is now left up to the voters (not SC) to decide how much is "too much" of any effects. If you think any effect has been over-applied feel free to vote accordingly.
But to my mind there's a difference between correction and alteration. All these examples create a perspective that doesn't exist.
Right, but where that line gets crossed is up to the voters.
Your entry is really good but I would have voted higher for the outtake. However I've never understood why it's legal in advanced.
It is legal because allowing "some" distortion/perspective correction is necessary, and it is now left up to the voters (not SC) to decide how much is "too much" of any effects. If you think any effect has been over-applied feel free to vote accordingly.
But to my mind there's a difference between correction and alteration. All these examples create a perspective that doesn't exist.
Right, but where that line gets crossed is up to the voters.
