I do not believe there has been a change. Self-DQs would not be listed, but I think standard ones should. Is there a particular challenge that a standard disqualification is not listed?
Ah, thanks markwiley. Maybe it's the self-DQ thing then. I don't usually pay much attention to the overall challenge statistics but for some reason took a look at Colorful Objects and saw there were two disqualifications. Went to the end and saw none. Then I checked a few other random but relatively recent challenges and found the same thing for
Head Shots
Maybe I’am wrong but what I believe you are referring to are the “removed images” and those are images that are tied with same score their fore there can not be an image in that place holder(#)
Maybe I’am wrong but what I believe you are referring to are the “removed images” and those are images that are tied with same score their fore there can not be an image in that place holder(#)
Nope -- on the left hand side, it shows two DQs. I believe that perhaps they're the trolls that got nabbed, and that's why they're not showing?
SC, you do realize that takes the fun out of it not showing who they were. ;)
. . .
Nope -- on the left hand side, it shows two DQs. I believe that perhaps they're the trolls that got nabbed, and that's why they're not showing?
. . .
Got it! And if that's the reason/answer (and from GeneralE's response to vawendy's joke I think it is), I'm fine with it. Thanks!
. . .
Nope -- on the left hand side, it shows two DQs. I believe that perhaps they're the trolls that got nabbed, and that's why they're not showing?
. . .
Got it! And if that's the reason/answer (and from GeneralE's response to vawendy's joke I think it is), I'm fine with it. Thanks!
My biggest concern is that Art may burn the wrong village...!
. . .
Nope -- on the left hand side, it shows two DQs. I believe that perhaps they're the trolls that got nabbed, and that's why they're not showing?
. . .
Got it! And if that's the reason/answer (and from GeneralE's response to vawendy's joke I think it is), I'm fine with it. Thanks!
I'm not sure in this case, it could also be the self-DQ thing, and since I couldn't really tell you anyway either way I'm not inclined to research it further ... :-)
. . .
I'm not sure in this case, it could also be the self-DQ thing, and since I couldn't really tell you anyway either way I'm not inclined to research it further ... :-)
Either way makes sense. I was just hoping the general practice had not changed and apparently it hasn't.
