I can't see the vote distribution, ie the histograms, for the photos in the two challenges that just finished voting (Extended free study and We have a story to tell II). Is this deliberate?
Interesting. I can see mine, but no one else's, and not just for these challenges but applied retroactively. If it's intentional, I'm not a fan and would call it one more nail in a half shut coffin.
Ha that's interesting. Initially it was only the last two challenges, and I could see the earlier ones. Now, after waking my computer from a "sleep" I can't see them for any of the challenges. Presumably the earlier ones were cached somewhere.
I can see 'em all. Win 10 Professional running Chrome Version 51.0.2704.103 m
I also have Windows 10 Pro. I can't see them on Firefox (47.0), IE (11.420.10586.0), or Chrome (51.0.2704.103 m). I have no plugins installed for IE or Chrome (because I don't use them), though a few blockers for Firefox.
So is this a new "feature" to encourage voting? My apologies if it's discussed elsewhere, but I've been otherwise occupied (which is why I didn't vote or participate in the last two).
Well I've been intermittently attentive but I am not aware of such a plan.
Originally posted by JakeKurdsjuk:
So is this a new "feature" to encourage voting? My apologies if it's discussed elsewhere, but I've been otherwise occupied (which is why I didn't vote or participate in the last two).
So is this a new "feature" to encourage voting? My apologies if it's discussed elsewhere, but I've been otherwise occupied (which is why I didn't vote or participate in the last two).
It wouldn't tempt me to vote if I weren't planning on voting anyway.
In my view, the histogram is only helpful information to the photographer anyway.
So... maybe that's the solution to the issue... if it's an issue?
I still wouldn't vote even if it were only the photog who couldn't see the curve... I sometimes think that that's just torture anyway... seeing all of those < 4 votes spelled out for me.
and why is there no yellow ribbon for 'tell your story' - and instead there are 3 HM?
A tie for 2nd place means no yellow ribbon for 3rd, and a tie for 5th means an extra HM on the front page.
I believe I can remember blue-red-red-yellow and blue-red-yellow-yellow etc, so when did this change?
I think you are mis-remembering your first example; the second can still occur if there is an exact tie for third place, and then there should only be one HM so that it is always the top-five scores represented.
If there had been a tie for third and a tie for fourth, THEN there would only be 5 on the front page, but the tie for 5th brings the 6th image to the page.
It wouldn't tempt me to vote if I weren't planning on voting anyway.
In my view, the histogram is only helpful information to the photographer anyway.
I feel the exact opposite way. If I want to understand the numbers in mine I want to interpret them through others' numbers, particularly in the low votes.
Have not been told if it's a bug or a hidden feature, but again, if it's the latter I am not a fan.
See above -
Bear_Music mentioned it was not intentional.
Originally posted by JakeKurdsjuk:
Originally posted by Lydia:
It wouldn't tempt me to vote if I weren't planning on voting anyway.
In my view, the histogram is only helpful information to the photographer anyway.
I feel the exact opposite way. If I want to understand the numbers in mine I want to interpret them through others' numbers, particularly in the low votes.
Have not been told if it's a bug or a hidden feature, but again, if it's the latter I am not a fan.
