I think it would be a bit unfair, because a new member could join, get a 7 score, never enter again, and be the highest average user forever. It's also much harder keeping a high average over 100+ challenges, as opposed to 10 or 15.
Konador is right, but all you would have to do is only apply those people that have entered 20 or more challenges.
I think it would be nice to see the top 50 or so photographers on this site. There are so many that come 5-15th every week and who don't post on the forums so their folios don't get viewed as often.
I would presume it's fairly easy to do being that all the data is already there.?
This has been talked about in the past, I don't know if it ever made the "list". As previously suggested, it could be done as a rolling average, with multiple categories:
Best of last 5 challenges
Best of last 20 challenges
Best lifetime*
*only those with >20 challenges entered are eligible
There aren't words to express how great this would be. But then, I love statistic analysis.
:)
Originally posted by kirbic:
This has been talked about in the past, I don't know if it ever made the "list". As previously suggested, it could be done as a rolling average, with multiple categories:
Best of last 5 challenges
Best of last 20 challenges
Best lifetime*
*only those with >20 challenges entered are eligible
This might be a good project for the end of each year. Just rank everyone who was a member for at least six or nine months. I think it would be fun to have a people's choice report, too... best of 2004, most improved, most helpful comments, most consistent, most active member, worst puns (ahem), etc. Give ribbons for the top three.
