Well, I didn't mean to make a comparison between MF & FF. I will try to answer your question best I can.
"In this image" not a great deal of difference after the resize etc and I wasn't really shooting for effect towards making a comparison. I thin MF gives a much better DOF and a much much nicer image than any DSLR that I have owned, the sharpness of Zeiss glass is very nice as is the contrast. I have yet to master how this thing truly works as well. When you see the prints from a MF camera they have a certain feel that DSLR did not manage, for me. I think the main benefit is the lenses and a sensor almost twice the size of a FF DSLR, with only 16MP on my particular back, gives a much better tone & better dynamic range. My back was made in the 90's so it's quite old. The newer MF digital backs are STUNNING!
I merely wanted to show how 2 different edits can change the emotion of a picture, even simple edits like these. |
