DQ'd for cloning. You've got to be kidding.
The 2nd horn and the leg. Ewwwww.
I should have sent in a shot of a pile of horse crap with a purple flower next to it. Seems like those shots are fine.
PS. Thanks to the folks who left such nice comments before the DQ.
This image has been disqualified for the following reason:
Cloning, dodging, and/or burning to remove imperfections and minor distracting elements is permitted, however using tools to duplicate, create, or move major elements of your photograph is not
This image has been disqualified for the following reason:
Cloning, dodging, and/or burning to remove imperfections and minor distracting elements is permitted, however using tools to duplicate, create, or move major elements of your photograph is not
So you broke the rules then! After my original comment, I went back and reread the rules, which state very clearly that what you did is not allowed.
I think it's a matter of perspective. In one way, the moving of the leg and horn are moving major elements, but in another way, it was simply removing the distraction of the bars instead of moving the leg and horn. It's still a really cute shot. Sorry it was DQ'd Tom...that's a shame.
You gotta be 100% clear on the rules, Tom, because the site council will not make exceptions for anybody. I mean, they can't or it wouldn't be fair, right?
I know you're upset but DPC is still fun. Better luck next time :-)
DQ'd for cloning. You've got to be kidding.
The 2nd horn and the leg. Ewwwww.
I should have sent in a shot of a pile of horse crap with a purple flower next to it. Seems like those shots are fine.
PS. Thanks to the folks who left such nice comments before the DQ.
Good idea, but poor execution, the editing is very noticable..if you print it you'll definetly see it. Anyway, you can't plead ignorance in traffic court so you can't here either [that seems to be a good enough reason]. If you layer the background with a copy, you can use the erase tool in PS to just remove the bar and then clone the skin tones, but that'd be a lot of work.....hmmm
Sorry about the DQ Tommy, I think you saved me the same fate.
I wanted to do a version of this picture using an apples and orange for the Freedom challenge (Freedom to be different)
Bannana/Orange which would not have been within the rules.
(edited because I had my apples and oranges confused)
Sorry about the DQ Tommy, I think you saved me the same fate.
I wanted to do a version of this picture using an apples and orange for the Freedom challenge (Freedom to be different)
Bannana/Apple which would not have been within the rules.
Cannot see the picture in this link
ou are not logged in or don't have permission to view this board
Click here to go back to the FM forum
Credit for this photo is Adesigner who's work can be seen on Fred Miranda's web site. It is only in my portfolio, temporarily for those who cannot link to FM's.
Credit for this photo is Adesigner who's work can be seen on Fred Miranda's web site. It is only in my portfolio, temporarily for those who cannot link to FM's.
I liked it a lot. I was thinking most the afternoon about what the setup might look like, lighting, and what editing would be needed after shooting. I was almost ready to go in search of the perfect apples and oranges when I read this. I may still do it, only for fun.
I liked it a lot. I was thinking most the afternoon about what the setup might look like, lighting, and what editing would be needed after shooting. I was almost ready to go in search of the perfect apples and oranges when I read this. I may still do it, only for fun.
Go for it, get a knife, an apple and an orange. Instead of doing it in photoshop, start carving. While it'd be more work, it would be legal for the challange!!
