I'm worried that the Sigma I just got is over-rated.
I've taken some shots, though none of them in ideal conditions, and I'm not blown away. When I do a 100% crop, it just doesn't seem that sharp. Even at 2.8+. It doesn't seem to have any of the back-focusing issues that some people have had, but I was told it's sharper than the 50mm 1.4 and the 85mm 1.8 and I just haven't seen that so far.
The pictures I HAVE taken were with the subject somewhat far away so like I said I haven't used it enough to REALLY make a decision on returning it, but can anyone back this up? Is it a good lens or not? |
