Author Thread
06/02/2011 11:34:17 AMPost actions · #1
06/02/2011 11:35:57 AMPost actions · #2
I hadn't looked at the free study yet, but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.
06/02/2011 11:39:21 AMPost actions · #3
Originally posted by vawendy:
but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.
Ahhh... the bottom of her feet?
06/02/2011 11:45:18 AMPost actions · #4
I bet in thirty minutes this will have been seen more than mine has.
06/02/2011 11:48:46 AMPost actions · #5
oh man, and i gave that one of my best comments ever!
06/02/2011 11:56:38 AMPost actions · #6
Ok, I did some study, I copied the image and with my photo editor i zoomed in as viewable possible... There is no doubt in my mind, and others for sure that you can literally see it visible, and yes there it was...
.
.
.
.
.
I could see her eye, that's a big no no!
06/02/2011 12:04:48 PMPost actions · #7
Did you download the Hi-Res? There is no eye.
06/02/2011 12:13:58 PMPost actions · #8
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Did you download the Hi-Res? There is no eye.
Well, it depends on where you look at... I clearly see an eye, under her arm ;)
06/02/2011 12:15:58 PMPost actions · #9
06/02/2011 01:32:22 PMPost actions · #10
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by vawendy:
but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.
Ahhh... the bottom of her feet?
You know there are a lot of people here with feet fetishes. Do you really want to contribute to their decline?
06/02/2011 01:41:32 PMPost actions · #11
I am morally outraged every time I take a whiz and see my junk!
06/02/2011 02:29:42 PMPost actions · #12
Here ya go...
06/02/2011 02:33:18 PMPost actions · #13
Originally posted by Louis:
Here ya go...
Are you suggesting he change his user (or perhaps non-user?) name to Strikesnip ?
06/02/2011 02:37:11 PMPost actions · #14
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by Louis:
Here ya go...
Are you suggesting he change his user (or perhaps non-user?) name to Strikesnip ?
More openly "StrikeMyBalls" ?
06/02/2011 02:50:06 PMPost actions · #15
Not one of my favs Leroy , but I don't see why it was dq
06/02/2011 03:38:55 PMPost actions · #16
You Leroy are GUILTY until proven innocent!
06/02/2011 03:43:34 PMPost actions · #17
The photo looks like it was taken at a train station. That's against the Patriot Act. Do you even know what happened on 9-11???
Leroy--->No Fly List
06/02/2011 11:17:15 PMPost actions · #18
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
Leroy--->No Fly List
That explains the men in black suits that have been following me around.
I thought they were just well-dressed stalkers.
06/03/2011 12:28:30 AMPost actions · #19
I think it should be very clear why it's been removed. Since this isn't your first offense in that area you really should know better.
06/03/2011 12:38:41 AMPost actions · #20
Originally posted by MattO:
Since this isn't your first offense in that area ...
You remembering something I'm not? As far as I recall I'd yet to be DQ'd for nudity.
06/03/2011 12:40:15 AMPost actions · #21
C'mon, Leroy. Although I admit it's hard to see in the entry vs. the full-res version, and I think someone really had to go out of their way to submit it for DQ, you captured genitalia.
There. Now it's spelled out.Message edited by author 2011-06-03 00:46:10.
06/03/2011 12:41:35 AMPost actions · #22
Originally posted by MattO:
I think it should be very clear why it's been removed.
And no it's not clear....
06/03/2011 12:42:43 AMPost actions · #23
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by MattO:
I think it should be very clear why it's been removed.
And no it's not clear....
You mean she doesn't wipe?
06/03/2011 12:46:30 AMPost actions · #24
Originally posted by levyj413:
you captured genitalia.
I disagree... there are no "organs of reproduction" shown in this photo. They are well concealed.
06/03/2011 12:48:35 AMPost actions · #25
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by levyj413:
you captured genitalia.
I disagree... there are no "organs of reproduction" shown in this photo. They are well concealed.
Whether you disagree or not, I'm betting that's why your entry was DQd. Shrug. See what the SC says.