so it is not standard on cs4 extended then (cos i cant find it)
No, definitely not. It's an upcoming feature. Not even any guarantees it's gonna be in CS5, that I have seen.
R.
ahh that sucks I was gonna go home and look for it on CS4.....damn
oh duh lol I see now at the top of that link it says sneak peak at a future version........lol I got all excited thinking it was hidden in CS4 somewhere
Oh, fabulous. I can start with a single green pixel, and have content aware create a beautiful photograph for me. I can sell all my gear, and I'll never have to leave the house again.
I saw the headline and thought this was going to be about Content Aware Scaling which is already in CS4 but this is a much more impressive and powerful tool.
Darn, just as DPC implement watermarks, they go and give us an easy way to remove them!
LOL! The stock photo agencies aren't going to be thrilled.
I don't know why people think it's so hard to remove them now because the're not. If you're good with the healing/clone tools there's not a watermark out there that can't be removed in about 5-10 minutes.
Speaking of which, the guy in the video wasn't even using the healing brush correctly, which is why it was leaving those artifacts. I assume he did that because he wanted to hype the Content Aware Fill, which did look impressive. However, I would love to see what the edges looked like where it connected with the original pixels because I'm guessing on more complicated images a lot of manual retouching will still be needed.
Oh, fabulous. I can start with a single green pixel, and have content aware create a beautiful photograph for me. I can sell all my gear, and I'll never have to leave the house again.
This is more along the lines of my thought process too. We're getting to a point where we don't have to worry about getting the shot right to begin with, ever.
You will find that it (that feature which I'm not allowed to say) will have it's place, but it's not the be all, end all that so many people think it is. Cool, yes. Put thousands of retouchers out of work? Not even close.