It's doing better than expected. I got a couple of 8's. I got a comment about it not being like the original. I don't want to go into detail to keep anonymity, but my purpose was to improve the original, not duplicate it. I think for this re-do type challenge we need a rule about consistently identifying the original from the title, not just in the details.
It's doing better than expected. I got a couple of 8's. I got a comment about it not being like the original. I don't want to go into detail to keep anonymity, but my purpose was to improve the original, not duplicate it. I think for this re-do type challenge we need a rule about consistently identifying the original from the title, not just in the details.
Votes: 10
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 6.0000
Comments: 1
As far as I am aware the whole purpose of this challenge was to improve a brown ribbon winner...not copy it.
I used a title that was close enough to the original that a quick search will find it. Looks liek thelow voters took their toys and went home. Getting some votes in the anticipated range now.
Haha I know it's bad of me to say that, I just really REALLY like my entry. Way more than any of the things I've gotten higher scores on. And in a way I thought DPC would appreciate.
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title.
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title.
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context.
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title.
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context.
I agree with ThingFish. After carefully reviewing each entry, I found that about 80% provided a convenient way to look up the homage Brown image. That was a lot of fun. Those who missed the technique used in the previous Brown challenge created a great amount of frustration.
Going to start voting and giving comments. I have decided to only vote and give comments on entries that have given an IMAGE ID and/or title so that I can go back and look at the original brown to compare it and base my vote and comment on that. I see many images that I cannot trace back to the original brown and so those I wont give score or comments on. I can only vote if I can compare the image to the brown.
Regards
Fred
Then you may not get 20% since the challenge theme CLEARLY said to put the original # in the description, not the title.
Yes unfortunately that is so. Bad luck. I found that pretty dumb as well and dont know what good that is. After all I want to be able to compare during voting and not after. So for those that thought a bit further and realized this and put a link to the original in their title it will be beneficial as far as my vote is concerned.
That's what this challenge is all about. Improving on a BROWN. If you cant see the BROWN you cant compare and thus the image is meaningless in that context.
I agree with ThingFish. After carefully reviewing each entry, I found that about 80% provided a convenient way to look up the homage Brown image. That was a lot of fun. Those who missed the technique used in the previous Brown challenge created a great amount of frustration.
Ho-hum...I am frustrating....!!! Not the first time I have heard that!!! LOL!
